As ever, a beautifully shot film by Roger Deakins. |
Written by Andrew Dominik, Roy Hanson (novel)
Starring Brad Pitt, Casey Affleck, Sam Rockwell, Sam Shepard
I've spoken before about twists, and about the spoiling of them. It's not always easy to talk about a plot that takes a sudden and unexpected turn, without at least hinting about the change of direction. On the other hand, do any of us really want to spoil a big twist in a film for anyone else? Do we really want to give the ending away, do we really want to take away the joy of discovery?
It is with some relief, then, that I come to The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. If ever a film was upfront about its intentions, this must be it. There's no trickery in that title, there's no leading you down the wrong path. Nor is it fundamentally incorrect, like Krakatoa East of Java. Nor, for that matter, is it gently prodding you to the wrong conclusion, in the sense that The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance wants you to believe that the fellow in question is James Stewart rather than John Wayne. Nope, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford does exactly what it says, and never lets you forget it. We've read the last page of the book, and now we're bound to watch the earlier pages being fitted into place.
In a sense, we're involved, we're voyeurs, we're caught in a story that we know will certainly end in death. We know who's going to be killed, we know who's going to do the killing. And this isn't a story like, say, Titanic, where we know the iceberg is coming but here's a girl and a boy making fools out of themselves to distract you for three and a half long, tortuous hours. Nor is it Gandhi, a film that begins with the certainty of a shooting but never lets you think that the shooting is the be-all-and-end-all of the story; it's a conclusion that we have to reach, but there's so much more to see along the way. No, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford isn't about anything else. You're here to see the murder. The title even tells you that it's not going to be a noble or heroic death.
However, the characters don't know this. Hence the voyeurism; we know exactly what's coming, and how ugly it's going to be, but we're going to watch all concerned find out for themselves. It's very appropriate that the film has us follow not the charismatic, legendary outlaw, but the coward of the title (a superb performance by the younger, and arguably more talented Affleck), his weakness, his guilt. Jesse James is often distant, or part in shadow, or moving away from us - while we stay much closer to the antihero of the tale. And that, ultimately, is where we belong; we can relate to the coward far more than we can relate to the outlaw.
Relating to the coward, following him voyeuristically, these are not easy subjects, and it would have been very easy for this film to fail, to become preachy and heartless. Fortunately, it doesn't fail at all (although it could have been twenty minutes shorter without losing anything), thanks to a fine script and beautiful and inventive photography by the always wonderful Roger Deakins. It's the elegance of the movie that allows us, nay makes us engage with Ford's weak and petty everyman.
Towards the end of the picture, Ford is asked why he did it:
Well, he was going to kill me.
So you were scared, and that's the only reason?
Yeah, and the reward money.
Fear and avarice, in the end, are dreadfully human qualities, whether we want to admit to them or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment